Karma Co.

Sam Bayer, Guest Blogger

A long time ago, when the world was young, there was a guy named Russell Wolff. Russell was this amazing ball of energy from, um, maybe Philadelphia – he moved up to Boston and immediately became one of my favorite pop songwriters. His album “Karma Co.” is everything you want from a pop album – whip-smart, great production, great songs, lots of attitude, and the chops to back it up. He became Liz Carlisle’s producer, and they left town to seek their fortunes, and they showed up in the Boston area to perform once or twice, and then…crickets.

This always fascinates me. Where do these people go? How could someone I thought was the bee’s knees just…vanish? Before the Intertubes, we were left to wonder. Now, on the other hand, well, just Google “Russell Wolff”. Kinda takes the mystery out of it, but one day, I was sitting in front of my computer, balancing my checkbook and rockin’ out to “Karma Co.” (it’s great checkbook-balancing music, I’ll tell you), and that’s exactly what I did. And there he was, big as day, hangin’ out in Nashville! And he’s done lots of cool stuff! And there’s an email address! And, of course, I couldn’t resist.

And, of course, he wrote back, and, of course, like everyone else in Nashville who isn’t on the stage of the Grand Ole Opry, he’s starving, but he’s loving his life. Now, I’m glad that Russell is loving his life, and I’m sorry he’s starving. But there’s a part of me that says that Russell has let me down, because I want more “Karma Co.”, dammit.

I mean, Russell’s music is mine. That sounds insane, doesn’t it? He wrote it, he recorded it, he performed it, it’s his, no question about it. But there’s that little voice in my head – and I’m betting that you have it too, for some author, musician, playwright, somebody – that has glommed onto this particular snatch of creative energy and laid a claim to it, that somehow has a wire directly into my lizard brain. I want more. I need more. And the fact that “Karma Co.” was the last full-band music that Russell recorded makes me sad – for the world – and mad – because I want more.

Now, I know that Russell doesn’t owe me a damn thing. He’s already given me a gift. Fifteen bucks isn’t a lot of money to pay for karma. But it’s a drug. I am, I guess, addicted to “Karma Co.”

This is the fan speaking. Art is designed to connect, viscerally. And the wars that are fought over copyright, nowadays, are fought, at least in part, over the ownership of the connection. We consume these things – we’re encouraged to consume them, they’re fed to us, by television ads, billboards, flacky articles in breathless magazines – and then the fight begins. Can I remix my favorite U2 tune? It’s mine, dammit. It was playing when I met my first girlfriend, or when I lost my virginity, or during that astonishing beach weekend where all ten of us watched the sunrise and bared our souls.

But it’s not ours. The music does not belong to us, legally. The artist does not belong to us. There’s a television series now called “Game of Thrones”, which is based on a book in a series by an author named George R.R. Martin. And a while back, my wife observes, fantasy writer Neil Gaiman was asked by a fan of Mr. Martin about the inordinate amount of time that Mr. Martin was taking in producing his next book, and Mr. Gaiman famously said, “Look, this may not be palatable, and I keep trying to come up with a better way to put it, but George R.R. Martin is not your bitch.”

Heaven knows that if one of my fans buttonholed me at a gig and demanded to know where my next album was, I’d either assume he was joking or wasn’t really interested in preserving his previous investment in orthodontics. I mean, I’ve been working on it. Really. Leave me alone. It takes money, and rehearsals, and the sort of time that people with ailing and elderly family members don’t really have. And I hate being in the studio, and my voice isn’t having the greatest year, and – just – no. As thrilled as I am that you like my music – as delighted as I am that you came to hear me – I am not your bitch.

And Russell, in turn, is not my bitch, either, as much as it grates on me to admit it. It’s crazy that I can hold these two contradictory thoughts simultaneously – I demand that Russell record another album, and I’m appalled at the thought that anyone would demand another album from me – but the fan and the musician occupy different parts of the lizard brain. You’ve all probably read those interviews with famous actors who find themselves tongue-tied in the presence of their professional idols – yes, it could be marketing flackery, but I believe it. The consumer and the creator are different beasts, living side by side within us.

After all my gnashing of teeth, it turns out that Russell is in the middle of writing a song a day for the entire year, to raise money for a friend of his with cancer. That might feed my jones for a while – but you know how addicts can get.

I Support Local Music in Massachusetts

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off

My Problem with American Idol

By Dan Cloutier

I have problems with American Idol and programming like it. I believe that this TV show tells the lie that the average person has no part in modern music. Simply put, American Idol is the search for human perfection in pop music. The people who do well on the show are individuals who are trying to have the best voice, style, look, and who want to be perfect. The obvious problem is that perfection in pop, or rock, or country, or folk, or even classical music is just not possible. Let us first take a look at the best examples of perfection in music from all human history. This conversation has to start with the likes of Mozart and Beethoven. These composers are the cream of the crop of human music. Being a musician myself, their music is so far beyond my skill that it is laughable to compare anyone I know to them. They wrote music that has stood for hundreds of years, and have moved masses to tears and great deeds, but the thing I find most striking about them is how difficult their lives were. Mozart died of illness and in poverty at the age of of just 35, and Beethoven wrote some of his best music after he had gone both deaf and blind. Neither of them would have won some grand popularity contest. They were far from perfect physical and vocal specimens, but they both did have an enormous grasp on what it meant to be human, and that is what made them great.

I am tired of the general public putting the pop stars and their vocal abilities on American Idol on such a high pedestal. The simple truth is that all humans can sing and should sing. That is the reason pop, rock, country, and folk music exists. This is the music of the common people who sing with common voices. Who in the end is the real Judge that says one person is better than another at music or singing? Can you claim this yourself? Does just hitting a note well make you a world changer or a bringer of good?

I think most will agree that music is not just for the elite. Music is a gift that has been given for all to enjoy, but more importantly, for all to partake in. Too many people these days listen to their tens of thousands of songs on their iPods, but do nothing with music themselves. They have just become music consumers, and by doing so have become passive observers of music and art. They have stopped creating music, or more importantly, they have stopped being part of a musical community. Shows like American Idol are partially to blame for this. This specific show even has a segment where they make fun of people who they feel cannot sing well. They crush people’s very real dreams in front of millions of viewers with judgmental and crass comments. How dehumanizing is that? Would you want your children holding such morals or being so quick to judge a fellow human being? Or more simply, would you want millions of people laughing at you because you sing off key?

Human history and civilization are based on cultures of people singing common songs. This has been in churches, synagogues, mosques, schools, political events, around campfires, and in the home. This is also happening less and less these days in America. How many modern parents actually sit after dinner and sing songs with their children and family? How many modern Americans are members of their church choir? The truth is that for thousands and thousands of years of human civilization, people did just that. That was their entertainment, and it was all about being part of a community of people working together to create art. It had nothing to do with just sitting on your sofa staring at a screen. American Idol and programs like it are making people think that you have to be the perfect individual to sing, but that is nothing more than a lie. All humans can sing and they should sing together. Anything less is an antihuman falsehood.

Let’s pose the question, “Who do you consider the most important musical act from the last century?” Would you say Bob Dylan, the Beatles, Joni Mitchell, Paul Simon, Led Zeppelin, or someone else? Now, ask yourself this question: “Would any of these brilliant and human acts win American Idol?” Of course they would not. Can you imagine John Lennon jumping through hoops for these television programs? Great music comes from being human, not from trying to be perfect and loved by all. American Idol, and programs like it, hurts real music. It stops locals from singing, and is less about creating community and more about creating individual superstars. In the end it just creates recycled, unoriginal, and less human music. So, next time American Idol or a show like it comes on, why not just head down to a local open mike near your own hometown and experience real human emotion and real human relationships?

I can promise you that it will change your life, and the world around you. Isn’t that what music is supposed to do anyway?

I Support Local Music in Massachusetts

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in Local Music | Tagged , , , , , | 25 Comments

Just Some Guy

Sam Bayer, Guest Blogger

I recently participated in a salon.

I’m sure, for some Abraham Bosse, "Reunion des dames" (Un salon de dames)of you, I’ve just conjured up an ancient Palmolive commercial, with Madge softening your nails with dish detergent (seriously, how is it that she was never fired?) – and now, I’ve just sent the rest of you to YouTube to view some ancient 70′s pop culture, and you’re thinking, man, how old is this guy, anyway? – but let’s get back to the salon, by which I mean something like the Algonquin Round Table, except with folk musicians (and stop it with the Google searches for a minute and just listen up, you young whippersnappers, you).

This salon was entitled “Open Mikes in Boston: From Club 47 to the Cantab”, and it’s one of a series of salons organized by the New England Folk Music Archives, hosted by Scott Alarik , charming performer, author of the book “Deep Community”, and former folk music critic for the Boston Globe. These salons are all open to the public, and feature selected panels of knowledgeable and presumably engaging people having, and leading, a vigorous conversation on the selected topic. This particular salon featured Betsy Siggins, founder of the New England Folk Music Archives, former executive director of Club Passim and one of the people behind the original Club 47; Geoff Bartley, virtuoso musician and long-time host of two open mikes at the Cantab Lounge; Don White, renowned funny songwriter and performer, now host of his own open mike in Lynn; and me. The event was on June 1, which you might recall as the Night the Tornadoes Came, so Don never made it in from Lynn and we just about outnumbered the audience; but that’s not the point, really. Actually, that’s not the two points, really.

The first point is: I’m pushing 50, and I’m telling you, listen to your elders. Not me, silly – everybody else there. The dirty little secret of music – well, life, actually – is that nothing much changes. Human beings are human beings: flawed, talented, ambitious, humble, greedy, generous, short-sighted, wise. We tamed fire; we invented the wheel; we learned to farm; we tamed steam and coal; we harnessed the power of information, through writing, movable type, wires, radio, and now digital data; and at every step, our strengths and weaknesses have led us to glory, tragedy and everything in between. This is what makes history fascinating: it’s all about us – in fact, it could be about you and me. Read Barbara Tuchman’s “The March of Folly” if you don’t believe me. And listening to the stories about open mikes past, from the 60s and 70s and 80s – way before my tenure on the open mike scene – well, the same egos, the same tensions, the same pressures, the same virtues have been with us all along. I wasn’t much for history when I was in high school, and I’m still not a big fan of “back in the day”ism; but while digital production and distribution have really, really changed music, they haven’t really changed musicians.

So you owe it to yourself to go listen to people who have been doing this for a while. They’re wiser, at the very least due to the brute accumulation of experiences; they’re probably more patient; and they’ve had more time to master their craft. I heard Geoff Bartley do a fairly new song at the Amazing Things open mike the other night (a rare treat, like a presidential visit). It was a protest song, based on an old Quaker hymn called “How Can I Keep From Singing” (which I have never heard, or heard of). And what Geoff did with it, well, I’ll tell you, it sounded timeless; it could have been written in 1850, or 1960, or yesterday. It was that good. You don’t learn how to do that overnight. And you don’t learn how to do that without knowing your history.

The second point is: me? Why me? What am I doing on the same panel with that list of comparatively illustrious folks? I’m just some guy. Because we’re all just some guy, here in our heads. It’s like not having the guts to ask out that hot guy or girl back in high school, when at the same time the hot guy or girl was thinking, “Why doesn’t anybody ask me out? What’s wrong with me?” You can’t see yourself, ever.

But I’m apparently not just some guy. Scott Alarik thought of me out of the clear blue sky, which means he thought of me. Because he’s seen me perform. Because he was one of the performers at “How to Raise Your Own Voice”, the event that Susan Master and I hosted at First Night 2004. Because I host a listing of the open mikes in the New England area on my web site. Because he and I both play Gurian guitars. In other words, because I’ve been, well, around.

Do not, do not underestimate the importance of hanging around. Because 95% of life is Just. Showing. Up. Being on time. Acting prompt and courteous and keeping your clothes on at the relevant moments. Listening. Eventually, you meet people. You hear things you haven’t heard before. You make a tiny contribution that takes on a life of its own. You do something memorable (and I’m not talking YouTube, “America’s Funniest Home Videos”, TMZ.com, front page of the New York Post memorable). You become, well, part of history. Someone who’s been around for a while. Someone who might have something interesting to say at a salon, maybe.

It’s been said that history is one damn thing after another, but that’s not exactly right; history is one damn thing happening because of another damn thing. This is the way our lives go; and this is the way history is made. And this is the way just some guy becomes one of the elders. Just by hanging around.

So go hang around somewhere. Something will happen.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in Live Music | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Music, Life and the Quality of Bad

D. Michael Loveridge, Guest Blogger

I love music. I love listening to it. I love the way notes work, how they line up to form melodies and dance around each other in endless combinations of harmonies and chords; with infinite voices in counterpoint, harmonious or dissonant, eliciting feelings both familiar or from some untapped well of emotion. Exalting and celebrating the human condition and plumbing its depths in song both both deep and heartfelt, and light and humorous.

I love singing and playing music, too. Howling at the moon and expressing myself with the sounds I can pull forth from my body or some other resonant device. In “This is Your Brain on Music” by Daniel J. Levitan, it states (if I remember correctly) that nearly every section of our brains are active and firing during the times when we are listening to or creating music; which suggests to me that music might very well be the most complete and deepest expression of our true being. And when I’m playing with a group of my friends who are all attuned and listening to each other it’s almost like we’re back running with the pack, hunting the perfect sound, aware of every subtle nuance of our musical surroundings and ready to react and turn on a dime at the slightest hint of some cue in a kind of instinctual free flowing synergy. Each contributing our own special vocabulary to the greater sound of our intermingled beings.

And yet this core experience is denied to a large portion of our population; those masses who claim no musical ability, no voice. And why is it they deny themselves? Simply because of the human need to analyze and codify everything, to set up rules and conventions to guide us in the proper use of our gifts and to rank us in our abilities to execute said rules and conventions within the established parameters of our society. And so large numbers of people choose not to join the dance because somehow their self expression will not meet the accepted standards of what’s considered “good.” However, if I accept my own supposition that music is the most complete and deepest expression of our true being, can any heartfelt musical expression delivered with belief and conviction really be “bad,” no matter how far it strays outside the established norm? I think not. But then I spent a good number of years expressing myself into the emptiness of my own room until the advent of the late ’70s punk boom, when many of us who didn’t aspire to the perfection of the rules and the conventions reveled in the sounds of our own “badness” and found our own voices. And in being “bad” tried new things and broke rules that we didn’t even know existed and expanded the scope of what musical expression could be. So I love it when I’m at an open mike and somebody “bad” comes up with what could be seen as rudimentary skills or an unconventional voice or both and blows me away with what they can communicate from their self to mine and learn something I hadn’t expected in the process. Or when I hear the beautiful harmonies someone like Joanne Hammil can bring forth from the voices of The Greater Boston Intergenerational Chorus, which holds no auditions and embraces members of all skill levels. We were made to express ourselves in song, our own songs. Listen sometime to the richness of the massed voices of some primitive tribe where everyone is singing just for the sheer pleasure of it and there are all these undertones and overtones and harmonics going on, just glorious, and every voice has a place in the whole.

sing people …………just sing………

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in Local Music | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Start ‘Em Young!

By Kim Jennings

A recent conversation with my son went something like this:

Little J: “There’s this girl in my class, and she dances crazy like this! (arms flailing, lacking rhythm)  She likes someone I don’t even like!!”

Me (thinking it’s a teachable moment): “Who?  And why do you think you don’t like someone?”

Kim with Little JJ: “She likes Justin Bieber (face puckering).  I don’t even like him.  And she doesn’t even like YOUR music.”

Me (still thinking it’s a great teachable moment):  “Well…that’s okay.  Not everyone likes the same things.  Some people like Justin Bieber’s music and some don’t.  Some people like my music, and some don’t.  And that’s okay.”  (Trying to reframe the question) So, what other music do YOU like?”

J (thinking): “Well you of course.  And Dan and Levi, Birch Beer Records.  And Ruthann.  And Lori.”

Yes!!!  All the people he just mentioned are “mommy’s music friends” – real, live, local singer-songwriters he’s met before.  People who are the real thing, pushing their music out in a grassroots way, making music that matters, and doing what they believe in – the way that works for them.

It’s too soon to tell what this will mean for little J in the long run.  For me, once I discovered FM radio and learned how to tape songs I liked by holding a cassette tape recorder up to the radio speakers when I was a wee young thing, I rebelled against the music my folks “made me” listen to.  But now, as an adult, I love how those influences come through in every thread of my own songwriting.  I hear the Irish folk music roots like Tommy Makem and the Clancy Brothers in my singing, and I can tell that there are ‘70s singer-songwriter influences like James Taylor in my writing.

Little J is only in 1st grade – but if his top 5 musicians are local musicians, I think I’m doing a good job exposing him to the power of REAL music, creativity, and expression.  And the idea that you can follow your passion.  And I’m very proud of that.

Start ‘em young.  Who knows what will happen?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in Local Music | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Things

Anonymous

There’s an ethic in our world that identifies the possession of things – especially things that don’t have an obvious utilitarian function – as a negative. The philosophical foundation of this ethic is that ‘things’ are an illusion, and a distraction from deeper realities such as our character, our soul, our emotions and our relationships with the world and each other. By this ethic, ‘things’ are considered baggage – and furthermore identified, not incorrectly, as a source of conflict and a measure by which some people unjustly position themselves as superior to others. This ethic has been around for centuries. It has been at the core of religious debates and schisms. Today it is probably at least in part, a reaction to the wanton materialism propagated by mass production and marketing.

But it could be that ‘things’ are getting a bad rap. What if there is an intrinsic value to ‘things’ beyond their utilitarian function and beyond the arbitrary and illusory monetary value placed on them by the market? It may be worth considering that all objects – and maybe non-utilitarian ones in particular – are a natural means by which we as humans position and identify ourselves as unique and distinct among others and in the universe. Not in an hierarchical way; but merely as a way of marking our space, perhaps in relation to the inanimate; of attaching a tangible meaning to what it is to be ‘us.’ The collection and possession of objects – not just tools, but items of adornment such as shells – easily predates human civilization, and as there are examples of such behavior in the animal world, probably predate the very hierarchical structures they are used to measure. And the fact that hierarchical structures evolved out of the human inclination to gauge the value of themselves and others by the ‘things’ they possess, does not mean that the ‘things’ themselves or the possession of them are to blame for the consequences of that inclination.

Old Vinyl Record Player image copyright pixelperfectimages.comWhile it would be a mistake to gauge our worth based on the value of our things, our ‘things’ are nonetheless, a measure of who and what we are- as individuals and as a people. And this may have serious implications in the digital age. One feature of the digital age is the increasing reduction of tangible non-utilitarian things such as photographs, movies, books and recorded music into portable, intangible codes. Codes of information are not intangible merely because they can be deleted with one keystroke. They are intangible because they cannot be measured with the natural senses accessible to humans and other animals: sight, hearing, smell, taste and feel. While a record album, a book, a game or even a compact disc, is accessible to all of these senses, an mp3 or a digital manuscript is not. And though arguably computers, cell phones, and mp3 players are accessible to all of the senses, they are merely appliances – tools that perform a specific function or functions. Our need to experience our senses is innate to who and what we are, and is a source of our identity.

If tools are all that is tangible in our world, and all other things are reduced to intangible code, what is implicit is that our only value as living beings lies in our utilitarian productivity. Thus, as our world progresses more and more in that direction, it should not be surprising that activities perceived as non-utilitarian, which involve the enjoyment of life, and recreation, such as the arts, are increasingly either devalued or converted into a ‘tool’ (to use for marketing for example) for the select few who have the resources to use those activities in such a way. This, after all, is what is becoming reflected in our things. And if we as humans are programmed to derive some sense of meaning and relationship from tangible objects, there is a possibility that in a world increasingly devoid of such objects, life itself will have less and less meaning. Considering this possibility, let’s hope that artists continue to produce tangible works of art, and that the public continues to desire and value those works.

Image from pixelperfectdigital.com
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in General | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Artifacts

Sam Bayer, Guest Blogger

Stack of Old BooksWelcome to another installment of my occasional feature, Sam’s Book Corner, where I rise from my sofa and not actually review a book I’ve just finished. This time, we’re talking (or not talking) about “Marshall McLuhan: You Know Nothing of My Work!”, a biography by Douglas Coupland, a writer primarily known for the novel “Generation X”. McLuhan, of course, is the Renaissance scholar turned media critic most famous for terse, gnomic pronouncements like “The medium is the message”. Coupland plays this biography relatively straight, although there’s nothing really straight about the genre-busting nature of McLuhan’s scholarship. He’s commonly regarded as the prophet of the Internet age – but as Coupland articulates pretty clearly, his prophecy is more Biblical than some would care to admit.

And with that, we turn to electronics repair.

I have this digital organ. A Korg CX-3, for you aficionados out there, an original one (which they no longer make), not the reissue (which they also no longer make). I bought this organ, used, in 1987 or so, around the time I joined my ska band, Agent 13. I love this instrument – it sounds exactly like a Hammond B-3, right down to the drawbars and the rotary effect. I don’t use it much anymore, but it deserves to be cared for (as much as I ever care for anything, but that’s another, slightly humiliating, story).

And at the moment, it’s a bit broken. The particular problem isn’t important; what’s important is that it’s not in the appropriate shape to help me record my next album. So I asked my pal Jason Benjamin where I should take it, and he recommended a particular guy at a particular shop, and I gave him a call, and after some negotiating and haggling, he volunteered to take a look at it for me. And when I brought it into the shop, he went into the back room, and when he returned, he said, “This is the only reason I agreed to try to fix this for you”, and handed me a 30-year-old repair manual for the CX-3.

Artifacts like this – well, for a certain subset of geeks, it doesn’t get any better. It was yellow, and a bit dog-eared, and the staples had fallen out, but this repairman had hung onto this manual because,  well, it’s invaluable. He used to repair a lot of these instruments,  and while he doesn’t see them much anymore, he kept it around, just in case. And it got me thinking.

It’s important to realize that this is a change. It’s neither virtuous nor evil, neither good nor bad. It has its advantages and its disadvantages, depending on who you are and under what circumstances you’re interacting with it. And we tend to focus a lot on the advantages – but for some of us who lived before the revolution, there’s something missing.

Take that manual, for instance. Sure, nowadays I can download any damn PDF I want to, and get manuals for all sorts of obscure devices – I can review user manuals for devices I haven’t even bought yet, which is a boon, I can tell you. But they’re not artifacts anymore. The paper doesn’t yellow, the staples don’t fall out – there’s no rarity, there’s no sense of history in the object itself, there’s no story to how it got to be in this particular set of hands at this particular time. The physical history of the information is gone.

And the treasure hunter in me feels this loss pretty dramatically. Used record and CD stores aren’t interesting anymore when virtually every song ever recorded is on iTunes for 99 cents. I know where to find everything – it’s easy. There’s no challenge, there’s no hunt, there’s no joy of discovery, and there’s no physicality or history to the object itself. There’s no physical or social aspect to the act of browsing. It’s just me and a terminal and the universe of bytes.

Don’t get me wrong – the digital revolution has been very, very good to me. I’m in love with digital photography and digital audio recording. But while the frictionlessness of YouTube and Facebook make it possible to bypass the bloated and arbitrary corporate staircases to fame, they’ve just replaced it with a different sort of arbitrariness, a different set of skills to master (search engine optimization instead of cocktail party banter, for instance), and ultimately, the claws of capitalism find a way to seize hold of those channels as well. And while I can find just about any book I’ve ever wanted, online at Powell’s or Amazon, it’s not better than encountering it in a dusty, uncurated corner in a Harvard Square basement – it’s just different: a different set of actions, using different muscles, different senses, different notions of time. It changes the experience, and there’s nothing wrong with preferring the old experience.

Some of you might be tempted to remind me that some people miss the flicker of the gaslight flame, or the whir of the plane propellors, or the smell of horse manure from the carriages, or, less nobly, the invisibility of gays, the silence of women, the easy profit of slaves. But this is just cherry-picking; or, more accurately, feces-flinging. It trades on the trope that progress is positive, rather than engaging with the question in any honest way.

And this trope is dangerous. I encountered, the other day, someone selling, on eBay, a CD containing a scan of an original Gurian guitar catalog. Not the catalog itself, but a digital facsimile. Now, the only reason it’s a facsimile is because the original was a physical object; but it’s telling that the lifespan of this digital copy will likely be significantly shorter than the original (which our seller is keeping, by the way). File formats keep changing; disk formats keep changing. Part of me fears this dystopic moment when an electromagnetic pulse destroys the last digitized copy of the Gutenberg Bible, just a short time after we discard the original because “in digital form it will last forever”.

Which brings us back to McLuhan. McLuhan really was a Luddite – Coupland thinks that he hated the modern world, and the mistaken impression that he endorsed the new media society was a misinterpretation of his critical, value-free eye. McLuhan, for all his impenetrable aphorisms, saw through this trope, or, perhaps more accurately, discarded it as propaganda, as wrapping paper for the phenomena he was really interested in studying: the individual as she interacts with the changing media experience, for good or ill.

But while McLuhan could subjugate his disdain for the sake of scholarship, I can’t disengage in any comparable way. I love my digital recorder, but I hate the hard disk as jukebox; I love Craigslist and free commentary on the Intertubes, but I hate the decline of of the broadsheet newspaper. The world has changed – not improved, not deterioriated, just – changed.

Someday, the drawing of the capacitor that has strangled my CX-3 will be eaten by earthworms; and someday, that digital copy of the Gurian catalog will be struck by a camel-back-breaking cosmic particle, and descend into the realm of static. Something – something – will kill them both. And decades from now – hell, maybe even next year – my
fondness for the broadsheet newspaper will be as transparently quaint as, oh, pining away for the days of the town crier. My experience – at this point in time, at this conjunction of media – will be gone, the tensions resolved, and history will be rewritten by the technological victors – but the lens of history is necessarily distorted, and it’s the moment that McLuhan was really interested in. There are billions of us living through this, just as there were millions of us living through the invention of movable type. And McLuhan was one of the first modern scholars to recognize that this experience – this engagement with ways we interact with the world – was worthy of study.

Image credit: Stack of old books from 4freephotos.com
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in General | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Benefit Concerts “With a Little Help from My Friends”

Strike a Chord Women for Rosie’s Place” this Saturday, April 2, 2011 in Framingham

Ruthann Baler, Guest Blogger

In January, my husband Michael and I were having dinner at La Carreta Mexican in Framingham when I began scoping out the restaurant. “This is perfect,” I said, and abruptly left the table to talk to the manager. This is a scenario that has become familiar to Michael when we are out with friends or having a romantic dinner alone. Conversation subsequently turns to exploring the potential of holding a benefit concert at the very place where we are on a date.

Strike a Chord Women for Rosie's PlaceLa Carreta seemed perfect. The food was fresh and delicious; the wait staff friendly and accommodating; and the location ideal: right off the Mass Pike in Framingham. I had been looking for more than a year to find the right venue to hold a concert to benefit Rosie’s Place, a Boston shelter for homeless women.

The manager said yes. Yes, we could have the function room. Yes, they would provide a restaurant discount to those who make a contribution to Rosie’s. Yes, they would add more servers for the night. Yes, we could hold the event for six hours. Yes, yes, yes, and yes.

The stars and the moon, margaritas and enchiladas were perfectly aligned.

We had less than three months to plan “Strike a Chord Women for Rosie’s Place,” a “Lilith Fair” style  concert benefit this Saturday, April 2, 2011 from 4-10 p.m. The event will feature poetry as well as folk, pop, jazz, blues, and rock songs from 30 Boston-area women, either performing solo or with their small acoustic bands. Also featured will be an exhibit of women’s artwork (for sale with a portion of proceeds going to Rosie’s) and raffle prizes comprising elegant gift bags and great gift certificates. This will be a fun and casual event in which people of all ages are invited to come for a little while or stay as long as they like.

Strike a Chord Concerts for Charity began in 2007 as a small benefit that raised money for Holliston’s Gulf 2 Fund, which has sent weekly care packages to local troops serving overseas since the war began. Since then, five more benefits have been held for the troops, two for School on Wheels, two for The Home for Little Wanderers, and one for Art beCAUSE Breast Cancer Foundation.

These benefits would not have taken place without the more than 60 musicians from the greater Boston area who have come together to give of their time, talent, and resources, not to mention the generous venue owners, sound technicians, merchants and individuals who have contributed raffle prizes, and volunteers who have helped run the events.

Strike a Chord helps raise money and awareness for charities through music by creating opportunities for people to come out and enjoy the many talented artists in their community. From Tennessee Barbeque to the VFW, from Stonehill College to the Doubletree Hotel, and from Club Passim to this Saturday’s event, it has been a great mix of venues, artists, music, and audiences.

This week I was asked to write this blog and share what I have learned about organizing benefit concerts.

This is a very interesting question. I have read on Facebook that some people think I am super-organized. This is only a half truth – one that is directly in proportion to the right side of my brain – the designated hemisphere that can only partially comprehend the nitty-gritty of event planning. My left brain (I am convinced) is still under development, further impacted by all the characteristics consistent with Attention Deficit Disorder.

Perhaps the FB postings would change if those people knew that for most of 2010 I drove around with an overdue inspection sticker and an expired driver’s license. Or, if they knew there was a set of keys (one of many lost) somewhere in Ashland State Park (with discount cards to Shaw’s, CVS, and Especially for Pets, if anyone finds it). Or, if they knew I have showed up at airports on the wrong day. Or, that I am unable to navigate a recipe without a kitchen casualty.

Somehow these benefits have taken place. In the beginning it was mostly through trial and error. More recently I have learned to seek out help from those whose skill sets are different from mine. This is where friends like Kim Jennings, Ellen Schmidt, Cheryl Perreault, Valerie Tripp, Suzanne Fredette, Al Cath, and Maria Baler, step in to shine a focus light on the seemingly small but essential details that are necessary for event planning. They have the left-brained expertise to help me keep all parts moving all the time. They have sent me kind little emails that begin with: “Have you thought about …..,” or, “Would you consider…..,” or, “You may want to…..”

No, I have not thought about (insert very important detail here) but thank God you did.

Thank you, thank you, and thank you.

Other lessons learned:

  • Before scheduling an event, research the activities that will be happening – even potentially happening — locally and regionally, to help prevent major conflicts. For example, one of our troops’ benefits happened to fall on the night the Red Sox were in the playoffs against the Yankees. Need I say more.
  • Acquire a really good sound system and confirm sound technicians early on. This is paramount to all music events.
  • Be realistic about what you can manage the day of the event. I have learned that running and hosting an event doesn’t work for me. I have been fortunate enough to have friends who are willing to be hosts and are excellent in that role.
  • Be open to feedback but always trust (and stick with) your gut instinct.
  • Know that you will not please everyone at any one point in time.
  • Finally, be willing to make mistakes and learn from them, discovering what works best/what doesn’t, and plan accordingly for the next event.

As with past events, I didn’t realize how many details would emerge for Saturday’s concert until we were well into the planning stages. Everyone contributed invaluable ideas and a great deal of time and energy, including overseeing the set up of the sound system and arranging for the sound technicians (thank you Mark Hastings, Daniel Senie, Dan Tappan, and Paul Beck), the performer lineup, artist contributions, flyers and posters, flyer distribution, raffle items, raffle tables, and publicity.

Strike a Chord Women for Rosie's Place Full LineupWe are excited about this Saturday’s spectacular lineup of women artists and their collaborators, with Ellen and Cheryl co-hosting. As in past events, admission is through donation of choice – which helps make local art and music accessible and cost-effective for everyone. Every single contribution is a contribution toward change. It all adds up at the end of the night, at the end of the year, at the end of nearly four years – now totaling more than $20,000 – to help make a difference in the lives of those we hope to encourage, support, and empower.

For a complete list of musicians, a schedule of their performances, and the donors who have contributed raffle prizes, visit Strike a Chord Concerts for Charity on Facebook.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in Live Music, Local Music | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Where Is Music Going and How Is It Getting There?

Tom Crossman, Guest Blogger

I love local music. I’ve been a Boston based musician for 10 years (off-and-on), a booking agent/promoter for 3 years, and now I’m venturing into the world of podcasts/internet radio. My program will be debuting this month, and while gathering content I came across an ad for a open lecture and panel discussion at Boston University.

I attended the lecture, entitled “The Modern Music Industry,” which I suspect some of you also attended. I wasn’t quite sure what to expect. The panel discussed a number of the industry’s “issues” – from how major labels have fallen behind in evolving with the music industry, to why it is that Justin Bieber and Lady Gaga are so popular. A few things were said that helped me realize that for new bands things haven’t changed all that much. It’s still all about touring, promotions and connecting with new fans. The only part of this aspect that has changed is that it has gotten easier. More places are having live music and as soon as a fan finds you on Facebook or Twitter they know when and where you’re playing from then on (as long as you keep posting).

One of the panel members made a great point that musicians also need to be business people. It’s not unreasonable for a moderately successful band member to also be a band’s booking agent / Promoter / Manager.

All-in-all the lecture was informative and interesting, but lacked any resolution. Herein lies the problem…No one knows exactly what’s going to happen with the music industry. It’s constantly evolving. Some aspects are becoming more evident, and some are fading faster than Britney Spears’ career. Guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in Local Music, Massachusetts | Tagged , , , | Comments Off

Catchin’ Up with CasUno

Jake Ostreicher, Guest Blogger

The local hip-hop scene is not a friendly environment. People are nice enough to talk to and will always make acquaintances where personal gain abounds. But these are not friends. These are people who want to make money. It’s rare to find like-minded folks you can build with, and maybe even call on for advice or encouragement. In my seven years on the scene, I’ve found this in two people. One of these rarities is fellow 508′er, CasUno.

CAS UNO Album S.O.L.A.S.TIn a scene laden with big-hype/small-delivery and a gang of come-and-go tourists, CasUno has found a way to stay fresh and relevant. Born Chris Andrews, this Syracuse graduate started life in New Bedford, MA and began releasing music in 2001 with his crew, Labeless Illtelligence. His fifth and latest effort, “Sticks Out Like A Sore Thumb” (S.O.L.A.S.T) released in October, to rave reviews. I caught up with Chris last month and hit him with a few questions. He had a few answers. Here we go.

Explain Labeless Illtelligence in a sentence or two. Is it a label, or a crew or what?

The core meaning of Label “less” Illtelligence is using your natural know-how to dictate your musical meandering as opposed to the standard status-quo. You know, to not follow the rules, like having to rely on ancient methodology of incorporating a label to push your music. It’s taking your stuff into your own hands. (Laughs) That was a run-on sentence.

How do you view the Mass hip-hop scene? And how do you always seem to stay clear of the politics?

It’s like any other local scene where people are playing the “king of the hill”, “king of the mountain” type steez…I guess that’s everywhere. I’m not dissing MA. It’s in New York too with the whole “King of New York” thing, the “NY v. LA” thing. That’s very geared toward labels. Labels salivate at stuff like that. People keep themselves in too much of their local context and forget that music is infinite and worldly at the same time. You can have music that exists where you don’t.

In MA, yeah, a lot of people are relying on their immediate surroundings because unfortunately people get stuck where they live. I have 2 kids and a wife. I still find a way to go where ever I gotta go to rock because I want to rock that badly. And it’s just that thirst to rock, not to spread my name or make money. I can stay relevant by applying myself the same way I look for music. In other words, where I look for music that I like, I put my music there. I reach out to those outlets and those avenues to find the people that are contributing like me.

You mentioned family. How do you balance music, work and family?

CAS UNO - FamilyI don’t separate music from life. It’s all the same thing. People are made up of multiple facets. We have no choice but to sit there and contribute every facet we have to make up one person. Like a pro baseball player saying they only eat sleep and think about baseball all day and nothing else comes into play. That’s B.S. That person has other parts of their life too. That’s a dream that a lot of people get caught up in, chasing this notion that they’re gonna make a lot of money. It just turns into a bunch of wasted years because that’s something you have such a slim chance of achieving.

Talk about S.O.L.A.S.T.

That acronym was not done on purpose. All I’ve ever done with my projects is try to epitomize my mood at that particular time. If you look at the song titles, they’re not based on the chorus or a word that’s repeated a bunch of times. It has correlation, but not directly. And honestly you only have so many projects to release so I didn’t wanna use a generic title like “Represent” or “Payin’ Dues.” “Sticks Out Like A Sore Thumb” is a euphemism for me. I’ve always pushed individuality. I don’t care what people think. I do what I want to do. I’ll be the one to stick out. I think that’s a major missing element in society today.

Use three words to describe your place in the culture.

Can I use words with hyphens? (laughing)

Yeah.

Non-existent, obscure, eccentric.

Keep up with CasUno via his blog:  www.labelessilltelligence.blogspot.com.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Add to favorites
  • RSS
Posted in Local Music, Massachusetts | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments